The general understanding of the legal and court system in Canada is that once a person is arrested and charged, there is eventually a trial. It is at this trial that the most familiar outcomes are determined: guilty or innocent. But while a verdict of guilty with appropriate punishment or an acquittal with the accused resuming normal life are the two most well-known outcomes, they are not the only ones that can take place in a court of law.
A stay of charges or stay of proceedings is one of the decisions a judge can make that “bypasses” the verdict a jury may reach. Let’s explore this less common legal decision and what it means for the people who receive it. We’ll take it step-by-step to get a better understanding of this process.
The Arrest
An event occurs where there is a firm belief or outright evidence of a breach of the law. The police respond and, if they feel there is cause for it, an arrest is made with charges applied to the person who has committed the act.
The arrest procedure should be familiar to most people, even if the knowledge is gleaned second-hand from television. The person arrested is brought to a police station, fingerprints are taken, photographs are taken, and the entire arrest process is documented, and entered into the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) database.
The Charges
Depending on the nature of the act, the charges may be criminal and need to be resolved in court with a verdict from a judge or jury. Circumstances may dictate that bail needs to be paid if the defendant wishes to continue with a normal, daily life until the trial begins. If the crime is very serious, such as murder, then bail is usually not an option, and the defendant must await trial in prison.
The Trial
The trial is where the stay of charges takes place and is where the expected legal proceedings can veer in an unexpected direction. The stay of charges, or stay of proceedings, is a very rare, very specific decision by the court officers, such as the lawyers or judge—not the jury—to halt the trial that is currently underway. In other words, the trial and the need to reach a verdict is “put on hold.”
What a Stay of Charges Means
A stay of charges effectively means that the trial is not going to go forward, and that, at least for the moment, there is going to be no further court action to seek a verdict. However, it is crucial to note that a stay of charges is not a cancellation. Even if the current trial has been discontinued, the charges themselves are, in a sense, “still in play.”
Resuming Trial After a Stay of Charges
At any time, a court may change its mind and decide to continue with a new trial to finally reach a resolution of guilty or not guilty. It is only if the charges are withdrawn that a person who has been arrested can be considered “clear,” with no further expectation of a future trial or verdict.
A stay of charges isn’t something that happens every day in Canadian trials. So, what would have to happen in order for a stay of charges to occur? And why decide to go with a stay of charges rather than simply withdraw a case if the decision is to cancel a trial anyway?
The Types of Stay
A stay of charges can arise from two causes. The first is a “Charter Stay” which is called for when it is believed that if the current trial proceeds, the Charter Rights of the accused may be violated in some way.
The second type is known as the “Crown Stay,” which happens when the lawyers and judge reach a consensus and decide that it may be better to halt the trial, rather than proceed. A Crown Stay can be called for many different reasons whereas a Charter Stay is specifically focused on preventing a violation of rights for the accused.
Why You Might Receive a Stay of Charges
The biggest difference between a stay of charges and having charges withdrawn is the intent. For example, the court discovers that someone was arrested because he bears a resemblance to another person who is wanted for a criminal act but the actual suspect is apprehended. Any charges laid against the first person will be dropped and withdrawn because he is not the suspect being pursued.
On the other hand, a stay of charges can occur due to various legal complications. For example, a lawyer may have a witness who, before the trial begins, agrees to provide a testimony in court that will confirm the guilt of the accused. However, once in court, the witness becomes “hostile,” which is to say that the witness is no longer cooperating and answering the questions in an expected way.
Example of a Hostile Witness
A typical example of a witness turning hostile is when an abused spouse or partner has a change of heart in the days leading up to a trial and decides not to provide the previously agreed upon, honest testimony, in an attempt to prevent the abusive partner from being prosecuted and given a prison sentence.
In such instances, a lawyer may put into motion a stay of charges simply because a smooth trial process is now in jeopardy with a hostile witness on whose testimony a conviction was reliant. It is better at this point to enact the stay of charges and keep the actual criminal charges “live” to be addressed at a later date if it is possible.
This stay may require talking to the witness again, or, in some cases, may even result in new charges being applied in the interim, in which case the previous charges are added to the new ones.
How a Stay of Charges Protects Your Rights
A stay of charges may occur because it has become clear that somewhere along the typical, legal proceedings, something may have gone wrong. To continue the trial in such a manner would violate the rights of the person being accused of committing a crime.
One example of a circumstance where a Charter Stay may be called for is in the handling of evidence. Someone might be accused of committing a crime, such as breaking and entering, theft or burglary.
A Charter Stay for Evidence Handling
One of the reasons that charges may be laid is because the evidence gathered at the scene includes fingerprints that are supposed to be a match. However, if an accident occurs and the vehicle carrying the evidence, including the fingerprint samples, is damaged and the evidence is lost or compromised, then this may be grounds for a stay of charges.
If an accused is going to trial, and there is doubt about the evidence gathering and preservation process, a Charter Stay may be invoked to protect the accused from an improper prosecution. Every Canadian citizen is entitled to a full trial with proper legal and investigative procedures observed. If these rights and protections aren’t adequately represented, then there’s a question of whether the trial is being properly conducted and whether any verdict rendered through the trial is valid.
In these cases, it makes better sense to move for a stay of charges and ensure that everything is appropriately documented and approved before resuming a trial. That is if the court even decides to carry out the trial again at a later date.
What Happens After a Stay of Charges
For those who receive a stay of charges, the pragmatic, real-world result is that everything is over, at least for now. The accused may return to regular life, there is no sentence served in prison or fines to be paid and no parole is required. On the surface level, everything has gone back to normal.
Legally speaking, however, things are still in limbo. Because the charges are stayed and not withdrawn entirely, they are still technically active. Should the courts decide to re-open the case, the charges that were previously stayed may be “reactivated” and the accused could once more go to trial and face a verdict.
On the other hand, the decision to resume a hearing may be postponed, perhaps indefinitely, and nothing more will come of the incident in terms of legal consequences. It’s also important to note that because no verdict was initially reached, the accused technically has no criminal conviction, so background checks will show that there is no criminal record.
Part of Your Record Remains After a Stay of Charges
While a stay of charges sounds like it should be the end of legal complications, it isn’t. Even if a person has no criminal conviction on their record, a background check can still show all the other processes leading up to the stay of charges. Practically speaking, this means that any organization or individual that decides to conduct a background check will still see that a person was arrested, fingerprinted, and even charged with a crime. That may not have any adverse effects on travelling to the United States since the Customs & Border Patrol is only legally empowered to prevent criminal record holders from crossing the border.
However, for background checks that are conducted for jobs, rental applications for a new home or apartment, or even consideration for adoption, the presence of an arrest and stay of charges can have an impact on decision-making. If your background check results in you being found unable to be bonded, potential employers may have no choice but to move past your application.
It’s entirely legal for one applicant to be favoured over another based on the information in a background check. For example, if someone were deciding on custody of an orphan, a child’s welfare is at stake. If they had to choose between a candidate with a “clean” background and one who had been arrested for a criminal act, the decision may be simple.
Resetting Your Status
Under normal circumstances, if a person has a criminal record, it is possible to have that information removed from a background check through a procedure known as a record suspension, formerly called a pardon. But things are a little bit different—and, fortunately, easier—to clear a stay of charges, withdrawn charges or a dismissed case. In these instances, because there was no actual criminal conviction, fines paid, or jail sentence served, the more elaborate and comprehensive guidelines on applying for a pardon are not applicable.
File Destruction for Stayed Charges
A purge known as file destruction will get rid of the last vestiges of an arrest and incomplete trial process. Like the record suspension, file destruction is something that must be applied for, and you need to meet certain measures to be eligible and then be approved for file destruction.
Fortunately, because file destruction doesn’t involve processing and deleting an actual criminal conviction, the criteria for qualification are far less stringent. A record suspension applicant, for example, may need to wait up to ten years without committing another offence before being able to apply. The file destruction waiting period is usually much shorter, although it still requires specific criteria to be met, such as not getting arrested and charged again in the intervening time.
Pardons Canada Can Help Remove Stayed Charges from Your Record
If you’ve been in a situation that led to a stay of charges on your record, you may want to consider taking the extra step of getting a file destruction. While a stay of charges is not as serious as a criminal conviction, it may still be something you don’t want appearing on a background check. Pardons Canada is familiar with these types of cases and can help you understand the stay of charges and your next steps. Contact us today and get started with a free consultation!